|
|
Post by Brett Bevelacqua on Feb 13, 2012 22:22:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Take a Wiff on Feb 13, 2012 22:36:29 GMT -5
Anyone with a Droid phone can download this to your phone. I've done it already.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brett Bevelacqua on Mar 26, 2012 20:01:41 GMT -5
This rule will be added retroactively to the 2012 Rule Book.
The team that wins the championship from the previous season can elect to come back with their roster intact to defend their title. The team will also be permitted to add rookies that they personally recruit. They may not choose players that finished the season on any other team, nor may they acquire rookies that the League or any other team aside from their team has recruited.
Under this scenario the defending champs must sign every player from the previous season, unless the player retires, takes a year off or creates a CORE-2. The defending champs must have at least four (4), but no more than seven (7) players on their roster by Draft Day. If a player from the previous year's championship team returns after the Draft, he will be placed on Waivers. If the champs decide to reunite to defend their title, no player that finished the the year on the champ's roster may enter the Draft.
Post Draft the defending champs will operate just as any other team would operate. They will be able to make trades and sign a player off of waivers just as any other team would be able to do.
The defending champs may decline this option and from a CORE-2(s) or go into the Draft
|
|
|
|
Post by Andy "BDB" Blickley on Mar 26, 2012 21:28:12 GMT -5
Dynasty rule. I like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Riegler on Mar 27, 2012 10:46:58 GMT -5
This is the best book I've read all year.
|
|
|
|
Post by D on Mar 27, 2012 17:00:25 GMT -5
If the champs decide to reunite to defend their title, no player that finished the the year on the champ's roster may enter the Draft. Does this mean if someone was on the championship team, the owner/captain and majority of the team want to reform, but the individual wants to be on a different team, they would have to Core? They can't enter the draft? |
|
|
|
Post by Brett Bevelacqua on Mar 27, 2012 18:35:49 GMT -5
Exactly, if they try to defend none of their players from prior year can enter the Draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fred Garvin on Mar 27, 2012 18:55:18 GMT -5
Mark my words, we will revisit this...
|
|
|
|
Post by D on Mar 27, 2012 20:39:54 GMT -5
Seems kinda shitty for a guy that might want to play on a new team but isnt ready to Core up if the rest of the team wants to defend.
|
|
|
|
Post by Take a Wiff on Mar 27, 2012 21:10:04 GMT -5
Seems kinda shitty for a guy that might want to play on a new team but isnt ready to Core up if the rest of the team wants to defend. Good point! |
|
|
|
Post by collision on Mar 27, 2012 21:35:31 GMT -5
If you won the championship, why would't you all stay together? It would be a vagina move for one particular player to leave and enter the draft. It defeats the point of coming back fully intact to defend the title. Bitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brett Bevelacqua on Mar 27, 2012 21:37:48 GMT -5
Basically this is to keep the defending champs from tossing out their 4th or 5th best player and put a rookie ringer in his place. For the most part if a team wins the players want to reunite if they are coming back, as with the 2009/2010/2011 Blue Jays and the 2012 Mets. I thought if anyone would want to move on, it would be the top players from the team not the lower end guys. I mean could you seriously lay out a situation where the worst guy on the team says I think the draft would be a better spot for me?
|
|
|
|
Post by Take a Wiff on Mar 27, 2012 22:06:54 GMT -5
I think very unlikely it would happen but why not have it as a rule.
|
|
